The Difference Between First, Second and Third-Party Data | FullContact

The Difference Between Zero, First, Second and Third-Party Data

FullContact July 7, 2020

Since we launched our suite of privacy solutions, it has generated a lot of interest and educational requests regarding the difference between first, second, and third-party data—as well as zero-party data. We thought we would take this opportunity to share the differences, as well as our perspective on the future of the industry.

If you’re working in marketing and you’re worth your salt, you won’t be surprised when I say that there are seismic changes happening related to data collection.

With everything going on in the market (third-party identifier deprecation, regulations like GDPR, etc.), companies have to rethink how they approach consumer data. You can no longer just “set it and forget it” when it comes to marketing decisions and spend.

You now face the challenge of getting the same conversions in a completely new way—so businesses are investing big in data to drive marketing and other strategic decisions.

But to stay in compliance and generate real trust with your customers, you have to use this data well. You have to understand the difference between first, second, and third-party data—and especially zero-party data.

Getting a good grip on data sources is key to making smarter decisions as the future of marketing is shaped by technology, legislation, and consumer consent.

Why data language matters

As a consumer, I can understand if you’re storing data within a cookie for my login. If you’re storing things in my shopping cart, that makes sense too. I even appreciate it if you’re paying attention to what I’m shopping for on your website. If I buy something and you ship it to me, I’d like for you to remember that so you can expedite the next purchase and delivery.

When I engage with your brand, I want you to know something about me and to retain that knowledge to service me in the manner I expect.

However, I’d also like to understand what data I generate.

And I’d like to be in control.

My data belongs to me first.

But that’s the end of the line for what the average consumer thinks about their data.

As marketers, we think about data a whole lot more and know that it comes from different places.

But the language that we use to identify the different types of data gets a little clunky. We refer to the data as zero-party, first-party, second-party, and third-party. But most average people have likely never heard of these terms before.

The difference between zero, first, second, and third-party data comes down to how it is obtained. Either the consumer gives it up willingly, or it’s shared by another company.

The ethical lines get a little blurry when it comes to how these other companies are collecting data. Some of it is collected without the consumer’s knowledge—and that’s why there is some pushback when it comes to consumer data collection for marketing.

What is zero-party data?

Zero- and first-party data are easily conflated in traditional definitions, so we need to increase our precision.

Zero-party data is the data you freely share with a brand.

When you fill out a survey and share your preference with a brand or submit a personal story through a social media competition, that’s zero-party data.

In more colloquial terms, it’s your data. You control it (or at least you should). It’s our belief that the arrow of time is bending toward zero-party control and personal identity control.

Will you decide to share your mobile ad ID with companies and brands? That possibility didn’t exist ten years ago, and in another decade, we fully believe zero-party control (or personal identity management) will be the new standard.

The trend on the ever-closer horizon is an increased importance of consented relationships on a first-party basis with the brands you deal with, and the partnerships they have with other brands.

What is first-party data?

The first-party data definition includes information a company directly collects about you when you’re interacting with their brand, like:

This data may be collected anonymously, but the most valuable interaction happens after you identify yourself to the brand (either through a login, paywall, purchase, consent, and/or registration). First-party data is used to identify your interests and show you more relevant advertising content.

Out of 1st, 2nd and 3rd party data, first-party is the most important and most valuable to a marketer.

The most powerful first-party data collectors are Google and Facebook.

Their services are so integrated into our digital lives that they have been able to grow exponentially. Facebook alone reaches a third of the world, and with most users checking in daily, that’s a lot of exposure.

The average brand just doesn’t see you or interact with you that often.

What is second-party data?

Second-party data refers to someone else’s first-party data that your brand has permission to use. This data use is enforced by contractual agreements and occasionally a digital ledger that maintains the permission the consumer has given.

These mutually beneficial partnerships are popping up more frequently, because brands don’t want to be left to the whims of walled gardens—a few large companies like Facebook, Google, Amazon, Apple, etc.

To bring the media control back within their own walls, brands and publishers are:

What is third-party data?

Third-party data is information from people that’s been aggregated from a number of different sources.

The catch is that this data may not have been provided explicitly by the person who created it.

Third-party data started getting attention when the Internet created a ton of web behavioral exhaust, which accumulated on vast arrays of servers all over the world. The atomic element for this type of data was a little temporary storage device called a cookie.

Entities you have no direct relationship with as a consumer gather data about you within third-party cookies. These cookies are set by companies other than the site you are visiting. They collect anonymous information to power advertising, driving a large portion of the content the world consumes.

As Google, Apple, and Firefox browsers restrict these third-party cookies, they disrupt a large portion of the monetization of the Internet. Google and Apple have the vast majority of browser usage (~70+%) and a duopoly of mobile devices. They control many of the rules that advertisers must adhere to.

Privacy protocols and zero-party data are the future

Ideally, however, individuals, as in real people, would have more control over how all of this is happening. Often, a person doesn’t truly have a complete view of how their information is being passed around.

Zero-party control will ultimately address this.

You, as a consumer, will maintain your own unique and persistent ID that can be leveraged by platforms, brands, publishers, and anyone else that you give permission to use it. Digital rights to your information and proper pseudonymization should be embedded within the chain.

But over the next 10 years, there will have to be many inventions created in order for true zero-party control to come to fruition.